12/12/2005

I was emergent. I still have the tattoo.

I haven't always been a traditional conservative type. Though I'm mad-keen on Isaac Watts and the Authorised Version now, t'wasn't always the case. Some of my readers know that, having been acquainted with me when I was young and slightly more foolish than now.

I did genuinely used to be a marginally enthusiastic charismatic who liked Terry Virgo (well, ok, I still like him..) and thought that St Matt of Redman was the giddy height of Lead worshipping (you have to get those words round the right way, 'kay?). I was even at the concert in Wembley Stadium to hear Delirious? and watch Gerald Coates wrapping some bemused children in flags. I was a part of the dance ministry, I wore skinny rib t-shirts with trendy slogans across the chest, and I have a tattoo on my arm of the Icthus fish.

Though I didn't know it at the time, and it wasn't called it at the time either, I even created an 'emergent' style service for the church.
I don't know if you're familiar with 'Bolds Fold' a series of pen and ink cartoons taking the royal mickey out of charismatic evangelicals in a good natured sort of way.
One of these very funny cartoons has three or so people all standing in a bowl of water, holding candles.
One asks 'What are we doing again?'
The other answers 'I don't know, but it's cutting edge'

Well, here was the issue at church. We had the morning service - children running around, an uncomfortable mix of hippy-hoppy-happy-clappy kids songs and the usual Redman/Delirious?/Kendrick-if-we've-got-older-members-in-the-congregation-today. The sermon/motivational talk and some perfunctory 'ministry' at the end while the children came back in from Sunday school groups.
Then we had the evening youth service - young people being very intense, an uncomfortably loud mix of Redman/Delirious?/David Ruis if we're running-early-and-need-more-songs. The youth pastor telling poo-jokes and a video of the youth-group trespassing on the local multi-storey carpark at night.

For those of us of a more 'contemplative' nature, it could be a bit difficult to find a place in the middle. Attracted as I was, and still am, to the multi-sensory approach of Roman Catholicism and Celtic Christianity, and yearning, as I was, and still am, for a sense of connection and depth, I helped put together an alternative service.

Gone were the rows of chairs, in came a circular arrangement.
Out went the strip-lighting, in came muted amibience.
Instead of walking in and being handed a notice sheet, you were given a small order-or-service and a natural item, like a pebble or a feather or a leaf, to contemplate.
There was contemplative worship music playing as you walked in, and you were encouraged not to speak before the service, but to sink into stillness.
There was some passages of scripture read, a poem, perhaps, a specific song to sit and listen to, a creative exercise perhaps involving naming certain sins on paper and then pinning those sins on a cross shaped icon of some sort.
I was quite keen on the creeds, so we used things of that nature too.
As an 'alternative to the other 'options' it was a fairly game endeavour. But the more I investigated, the more I felt uncomfortable. I purchased a course akin to Alpha, but more directly aimed at 'New Age' types, and the more I looked at it, and the things I was embracing at church, the more uncomfortable I became. I researched the bigger picture of some of the people quoted approvingly, and found my conscience pricked. And slowly, I began to withdraw from it. The alternative service, at least the version I was involved with, was short-lived.

I do understand, really I do, the dissatisfaction and weariness of those who are part of the emergent church. I am no longer dissatisfied to that degree, but I still understand it and can feel the pain of it at times. But it doesn't lead anywhere. It seems brave and authentic, but it just left me emptier than before. Now, I also know that the emergent vision is a whole lot bigger than just a style of worship. It's a social move as much as anything else - a desire to see the church making a real and radical difference in the world around us. I can understand that too. In fact, radical, servant-hearted love is still, as far as I am concerned, part and parcel of the Christian walk. It never went away. But serving alone is just sanctified Boy Scouts at best - and works salvation at worst. If our servant-heartedness doesn't arise from a copper-bottomed commitment to real grace - the bible kind, not the jellybean kind - then it's just really pretty self-righteousness.
And you can grab for all the multi-sensory kitsch to make yourself feel you have been spiritual as well as practical, but you're never going to feel fed and healthy unless you start eating the bread of life. When you eat candyfloss, no matter how much you cram down, you'll have a short-lived buzz and then have to work really hard to have the energy to do the things you feel called to. When you digest the bread of life, good works follow because they must and they're not the practical bit to the spiritual bit in church. It's all of a piece.

11 comments:

Dyspraxic Fundamentalist said...

What a fantastic description of a Charismatic service! I have been to so many of those. My parents are Charismatics and got me to go to mad conferences and youth events, not to mention the Toronto stuff. It really was awful.

I tried the Celtic stuff and even a bit of Anglicanism in my late teens. That stuff just left me empty.

It was only when I was at university that I discovered the importance of studying the Bible and letting it dictate the agenda, instead of just doing whatever seems a good idea at the time.

Every Blessing in Christ

Matthew

Chris Tilling said...

Lovely prose.

I find that there are believers in every tradition of worship who are able to truly seek God and connect with him, whatever the paraphernalia (ok, I had to spell check that word, and, yes, I spelt it wrong).

My favourite expression of worship remains meditation on the scriptures. But I'm trying to learn to recapture the communal dimension of worship more, and to incorporate a bit more liturgy too! (Liturgy? I would have excommunicated myself for saying that about 4 years ago)

And I totally agree that there is danger in the emergent camp. But I've been around conservatives long enough now to realise that a firm commitment to grace has often simply led to the same old same old that leaves the world unchanged, and our social obligation to our poor a second standard spirituality.

Dyspraxic (interesting name!), I wonder if it is as simple as 'letting the Bible dictate the agenda'. The Charismatics, the conservative evangelicals, the emergent lot, they all claim that they do this! We all read the Bible from a certain perspective and with a varia of lenses so that 'whatever seems good at the time' and 'the Bible' always become to a certain extent mixed. We all do it, but that's also OK (mostly). That's what a good incarnational theology can appreciate.

God's blessings on you all,
Chris

Dyspraxic Fundamentalist said...

Incarnational theology means a lot of different things. The Church's experience is grounded in Christ's ascension into the heavenly places and the descent of the Holy Spirit to earth to indwell it. Any theology of incarnation needs to take that into account and I do not think most 'Incarnational' people do.

In my experience the PostModern Charismatics just come up with lots of new ideas and read them into the Bible.

To be honest I think the Reformed people do that a lot to, except they are using the ideas of the 17th century, instead of seventeen months ago.

Every Blessing in Christ

Matthew

Joe said...

In my mind (feeble though it might be), if the focus is on Christ and His Word, the form of worship is not so important.

Some make me more comfortable than others, but then it isn't about me, is it?

Ray said...

Well said Libbie.. I, too, came from a similar place, and appreciate the fact that you understand many aspects of the emergent movements etc. I think a simple rejection of all things emergent is a mistake; they have some good points they have raised; it is primarily what they consider to be the answers to these points which I find ofttimes disturbing.

While I am reformed, I too agree with Dypraxis as well, in that some of my MORE reformed (whatever that means) friends have a tendency to read things into the Bible.

Very good post Libbie!

Steve said...

Hi

How do you know that servantheartedness doesn't arise from etc etc....?

What is it that you have seen that in what you woudl call the ec, that causes you to raise it as a spectre to be avoided, along with a lack of 'bread of life', weariness, etc, in a post about the ec?

None of it rings true in my real life experience? I'm curious to know where it comes from in your experience?

Libbie said...

Steve.. I'd say that servantheartedness must arise from our humble position of salvation before God. It's like the last part of an Isaiah 6 experience - We have a vision of the Glory of God, we are undone, we are cleansed and then we say 'Here I am, send me'
There's lots of motivating factors subsequently, but I believe it must arise from that basic understanding, because anything else seems to me to veer towards works..

I've tried to sketch my experience here. I found the eclectic sources that were accepted, and the lack of concern about those to be probably my biggest red flag about the ec.
It's one thing to be open-minded and able to learn - it's another thing to give everything a pass. I guess it's that part of the 'generous orthodoxy' that I have trouble with.
It also, ironically, seems just as consumer-oriented as much of the purpose-driven style that it seems to be partly a reaction against.

Steve said...

Hi Lib

As I've begun in the last few months, to read blogs that would describe themselves as emergent, and those that definitivly wouldn't, I've begun to notice more and more a difference between what I read on blogs, and my real life experience of church and people that would call itself emerging.

As things have erupted in the last few months, it seems as if understanding and the ability to see past our own perceptions of what someone is saying, to what they are saying, has become harder.

This post talks about dissatisfaction, and I see that everywhere on the internet - even this post is about dissatisfaction with a particular group - as are others on so many blogs.

In real life though, I'm confident we woudl find people who are switched on for God, humble in the face of his grace, and determined to serve and impact their world, and others worlds.

I so agree with what you say about where true servantheartedness comes from, and while there will always for many of be a part of ou identity which is trying to please God or earn his pleasure (human nature and experience), I don't know anyone who would suggest otherwise.

I wonder if what you see is people saying is - I'm saved purely by God's grace, but that what I do now is incredibly important, not for my salvation, but because salvation in the sense of going to heaven is only part of the picture - that out of God's grace and salvation, comes a calling to serve and be a part of God's salvation history in our world.

Saved by God's grace along, and living for Jesus alone, becasue God's grace is the beginning and the end of his call to us to serve, much in the way that the beginning and the end for Jesus was about servng.

I'm interested in what you've read, from what I've written?

Which isn't that different to what you are saying I think. I've never met anyone who advocated salvation by works, and I wonder if it's a bit of AN URban myth fed by misunderstadnig of this type.

Steve said...

Odd - that last single line is supposed ot be at the bottom

Libbie said...

I doubt that we are very far apart when it comes to seeing the importance of Christian Service, Steve.
I honestly see some strange contradictions in the ec. Same as any other movement I suppose.
I'm going to write a post about this, cos I think it's a bigger topic and only fair that it gets a bit more space..

Paul said...

Well done!! Not enough Christians question such things and those that do are often grumpy old men with no hands on experience.