Now, that got your attention, didn't it?
I was thinking about how a Christian should sensibly approach the topic. Not whether we should do it or not, I would hope there wouldn't be much variety of opinion on that. I mean acts of blasphemy committed by various unbelieving members of society.
There are various opinions. One is, of course, enshrined in the blasphemy laws of this land which are a bit of a legal minefield anyway. Some Christians believe it's all a bit silly and God is big enough to take care of Himself, so we shouldn't worry about it. Still others believe in pickets and protests at blasphemous plays and the like.
In looking at this, the word that keeps cropping up is 'offense'. It's a rather slippery term. Worldwide, Muslims let their feelings on their own definition of blasphemy be known by rioting, demonstrating and generally demanding new laws for religious censorship. Which once again highlights the Muslim worldview that you have to impose good behaviour from the outside. Recent law in England narrowly avoided a situation where being religiously offended could become an criminal act.
I find myself on the liberal end of the scale on this issue, which is a rather unusual and mildly unpleasant feeling. I don't believe the Blasphemy laws of this country have any sensible place in modern society. We are not a theocracy - therefore we have no place prosecuting people for 'religious' crimes. This is a helpful link to the current understanding of blasphemy law in the UK.
I also don't think we should stand outside theatres with banners, shouting about how offended we are by whatever blasphemous nonsense may be going on inside.
Now, do I think Blasphemy should be given a special pass because we live in a secular society, and most people don't worship the Lord anyway? Well, no, not a bit of it. I'm not even coming at this from a pragmatic point of view about what works and what doesn't - though I have to say, in terms of fighting against blasphemous talk, picketing a theatre does resemble an ant pushing a car uphill.
No, I do emphatically believe blasphemy is a crime. But against who? When I hear that 'Jerry Springer the Opera' makes the sickening claim that God raped Mary, who is being slandered? Now, yes, I certainly should be horrified by such a claim, because I know it is a false and hideous accusation. But is it blasphemy if it offends me?
Blasphemy is surely that because it offends God. Therefore, our approach to it should be the same as the right approach to adultery. It is a sin - and those who commit it will come under judgement - not by a member of the earthly judiciary, but by the Almighty creator.
The result then, should be that our prime motivation, when speaking out against blasphemy, is not offense but compassion. To illustrate :-
Your father has made a beautiful steam locomotive. It's shiny green and the machinery is perfect. Everyone who has seen it thinks how marvellous it is. It begins a journey on some tracks, and builds up a good head of steam.
However, further down the line, you notice a man standing on the tracks, shouting.
"That's not a train, it's a cabbage! If I was going to make a train, I'd make it much better! Your father stole that train! I don't even believe that train is there!"
Now, you could stand, watch and listen to the man, and become deeply offended by the rambling nonsense that man was saying. But surely the more pressing thought on your mind would be that he was about to be pureed by an enormous locomotive train.
People casually blaspheme everyday, oblivious to the consequences, and we can see their precarious position all too clearly. By all means speak out when you hear someone blaspheme, but don't tell them it offends you - tell them it offends the Almighty creator God who will one day judge them for every single word they speak. Use something that denigrates our gracious God, and turn it into something which glorifies Him.
8/13/2006
Blasphemy!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




7 comments:
I'm not real big on the picketing of theaters either, because it seems to have the same effect as saying, "Don't look now..." The first thing people want to do is look. On the other hand, I'll give a bit of credit to those who do picket, because at least they're doing something.
We may possibly be able to change people's behavior through laws so that they don't offend us anymore, but that overlooks the main thing. Jesus said "the truth will set you free" and if that's what He thinks, then that should probably be our first approach too, to keep on bringing the truth to the world. People who have been set free from sin don't often feel the need to blaspheme.
Libbie, I am glad you are not into the protesting blasphemy thing. I do not thing there is very much to be gained by it at all.
God Bless
Matthew
Writing as I do from Cardiff, where the whole Jerry Springer thing was played out, I can say that this did have a negative effect on the attendance, and did not reflect badly on Christians. Hymns were sung and tracts handed out. This was not a picket, it was a witness. Pickets of the sort you mentioned are not legal.
But I accept that others differ from my view. Whatever the case, our aim should be that God is glorified. To paraphrase Paul, let him who protests do it to the Lord, let him who does not protest do it to the Lord.
And let all be done in love. I find that bowing one's head at the mention of the name of Jesus or of God has a better effect than being offended.
Common courtesy means that we should oppose anything which tends to ridicule the deeply-held beliefs of others, but one cannot legislate good manners (unlike moral behaviour). And we must be careful of ourselves. How many people, I wonder, said there was nothing wrong with the Danish cartoons but that Jerry Springer: the Opera should be banned? For myself, I feel that both were impolite and should not have been done in the interests of good taste.
And yes, we prayed for all who saw it, etc.
I don't have a problem with the protests about Jerry Springer per se. I even happily signed petitions - particularly about the BBC airing of it.
My post was mostly about motivation, as I recently saw a debate on this between atheists and a variety of Christians, and the only Christian responses were either a sort of laissez-faire 'God doesn't mind so much' or a 'I am grossly offended, and that shouldn't be allowed'; both of which miss the mark, I feel.
I believe what you have expressed should be the heart of every Christian. Of course, I suppose we need to factor in temperament.
Thanks for the very well spoken words.
I was a blasphemer. The Lord Jesus Christ became blasphemy for me. 2 Cor 5:21
I Thank him every day. We do need to hate it when we see the Lord's holy name blasphemmed, but we need to show others that we are grateful that we have been forgiven, and our blasphemous hearts have been changed, so that now we love the name of Jesus Christ, and we love our Savior, because He first loved us.
Nodding furiously to your last comment Libbie - when I read the post first I thought: Hmmm, aren't you confusing the issue of our ultimate reason/motivation for protesting, with the issue of how to express that protest. Things like having (keeping) blasphemy laws, and protesting with placards etc, really aren't inconsistent with a commitment to that motivation you articulated in the post.
It makes more sense if you were responding to something specific obviously.
Anyway, keep up the good work!
Amen, Libbie, the Lord looks on the heart.
While we, poor foolish children of the dust that we are, too often look on the outward things. The smiles of friends, the frown of foes.
Whatever we do, let us do it to the Lord.
Post a Comment